Their simple story seems to contain numerous inconsistencies and self-contradictions. Too much Zionic Mass Media coverage. Too much being used as witnesses, footage being used, blah blah. Too perfect location. Too perfect framing. Too perfect lighting. Too perfect camerawork using (according to the announcer at 0:23 in) a boxed / untouched / unfamiliar camcorder. The whole story becomes more and more unbelievable and unlikely by the moment until even the most stodgy wanna-believer may confess it plays more like just another invented whole-cloth put-on than past genuine reality. It feels like another Zapruder film but for 911. The whole thing also reeks of emotional ploy. I’m very highly suspicious of its authenticity.
Tami is the only other person I’ve ever heard mention anything about seeing “plane parts” (“I looked out and I saw what to me looked like the wing of a jet…or at least part of a wing, and parts of a plane that I saw coming down from the sky” 2:05 in). Her story resonated with the UPS plane tail I watched (in near real-time that morning) swoop down and disappear into the flame-and-smoke-billowing Pentagon.
However, Tami is stunningly vague about what she supposedly saw – as if she can not quite remember exactly because it did not actually happen, because hers is an invented recounting. Upon my first listen, I felt instantly that she was lying. Compound by the numerous subsequent anomalies and feelings of being lied to, I’m even more certain Tami and Guy are crysis actors / plants / stooges / controlled-whatevers.
2:30 sounds incredibly fake, like a voice overlay. Also, notice that police sirens are unusually clear, present-sounding with full-body and without echo; this from supposedly 35 stories (~350 feet) up and with all windows closed, hermetically air-tight. In fairness, perhaps the police sirens were wailing from their television, on and tuned to news, which plays throughout the video.
4:00 similarly strange is how loud and clear the hotel emergency announcement / directions sound out.
4:30 This sounds to me like strained expositional story-telling, an attempt to bolster the supposed (and possibly stuffed-dummy) “jumpers” story and emotional appeal.
Regarding the supposed persons supposedly leaping from the building(s) —
All the “falls” are extremely jilted and unnatural looking in every way: Specifically, each jump seems more like stuffed dummies or perhaps CGI. The incredibly strange physically impossible “mid-air / mid-jump hovering” from 5:30 to 5:35 is a great example of this seemingly fake/dummy jumper hoaxery (and the literally mid-jump sideways-flight from 5:35 to 5:38 is another great example of clear physical impossibility) – the blotting censorship and clearly impossible movements draw the entire “jumper video” and supposition into extreme doubt.
When Examined In-Reverse, Lies Are Revealed
At 5:47 Tami alerts, “There goes another person, Guy!”
Four seconds later, the 14 video frames at 5:51 show obvious video manipulation. Consider that the camera records 30 frames per second at constant rate, so inter-frame spacing is 33.3 milliseconds (0.0333 seconds between the start-moments of any two frames). Because hoaxery often fails when viewed in reverse, let’s consider the 14 frames in reverse, labeled from A to N.
Frame N shows no falling body – the body has already ‘passed through’ this view, so we will discard it first:
Frames Missing Expected Content
This exact same technique of “frames missing expected content” echoes the “One Giant Oops of 911 WTC” video snippet in which the supposed plane hitting the second (north) tower does not appear in the immediately-previous wider-angle footage! That the plane is not visible in the wider-angle shots proves CGI, that the plane was either erased out of the wider angle video or was painted into the close-up angle of the building strike.
SOURCE https://www.bitchute.com/video/5aNJOdsZCKW2 (Richard D Hall RICHPLANET 2010 “9/11 TV footage and amateur video analysis” with Andrew Johnson of checkthevidence.com) Apparently Andrew Johnson discovered this anomaly, impossible to explain without hoaxery / video fakery. It’s extremely difficult to tell a lie in-reverse, so by examining the footage in reverse order, Their Big Lie unravels.
The Zapruder Film (of JFK infamy) provides other similar examples of impossible movements, missing/vanished/moved objects. The confounding manipulations of video evidence are ‘an old trick’ used by the ‘intelligence services’ as should be readily apparent to any mildly skeptical mind.
On another hand: Military microwave weaponry research shows that energy bursts scramble the brain chemistry and thus thinking. Dr Judy Wood posits that microwave bursts cause a reflexive yank-away (like hand from hot stove) and that perhaps the ‘jumpers’ were not leaping by choice but rather by uncontrollable instinctual reaction to the water-boiling insta-heating caused by the DEW energy bursts used first to soften the building materials and ultimately to “dustify” and destroy them. From this psycho/biological aspect, the actions of the jumpers (to actually be propelled out the windows) seems to be explained logically by innate reflexive biology.
See 911 ALCHEMY extensive research into the so-called jumpers.
Guy’s whole spiel about turning the camera off to talk about what they were seeing and to process everything off-camera is such a load of horseshit. They cut the feed to make for one less video angle to manage, control and track: Guy talks about hearing the roar of an accelerating plane from around 6:00 in, about “the concussion of [the impact] sent me [flying] across the room” … too bad there is no sound on recorded on the video; there is no camera shake; the windows do not shake; they do not yell out in surprise; and then the camera supposedly cuts off. What a load of horseshit. The part about levitating and flying across the room from the DEW energy blast is believable and jives with the known effects of the HUTCHISON EFFECT, but whether they directly experienced this personally, or whether they are merely telling a story scripted for them, to confound and dismay…who can say?
